Advice needed Ranger torque splitter comb. with SM 420 or SM 465 trans ? Found this link today and thought that the advance OD combined with the SM 420 or the model SM 465 is a good outcome for the chevy 1950 1/2 t. truck with torque tube , you have to shorten the tube a 7". Any one have any experience with the Ranger torque splitter combined with the SM 420 or SM 465 transmission ? Which of the two transmissions are to prefer in range or quality ? http://www.advanceadapters.com/ I `ll apreceate the advice. Martinius.
Parts I don't see any over drives there but they do have yokes a plenty ~ Robert has been looking for a yoke for some time now...
Ranger torque splitter Nate If you scroll the way down at this page the chevy torque splitter shows with diff. retainer index. Retainer index is 4.686 ". Martinius http://www.advanceadapters.com/search_results.php?keywords=Ranger&=
760001m-27 This one : http://www.advanceadapters.com/prod...iter-overdrive-27-with-a-4686-retainer-index/ ? Looks nice and the review says the buyer used it with a Muncie SM420 . Spendy bugget tho' .
