Can someone decipher my Engine number

Discussion in '1947-1954' started by ssexton1, Dec 4, 2011.

  1. ssexton1

    ssexton1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    82
    Location:
    Kansas City USA
    It is 0974789F54

    It is being used as the VIN on my WI title which I know can be difficult to title in MO when I'm ready--but it is still the original 235 engine.
     
  2. Kens 50 PU

    Kens 50 PU Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,403
    Location:
    tomball, tx
  3. ssexton1

    ssexton1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    82
    Location:
    Kansas City USA
    That helped tremendously. I did leave a letter off. It is a F54 M

    It says (and correctly) that it is a 3100 with Automatic Transmission.
     
  4. vwnate1

    vwnate1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    11,643
    Location:
    AMERICA !
    Your Engine

    ? you have a Hydromatic equipped pickup truck ? .

    You lucky dog .
     
  5. ssexton1

    ssexton1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    82
    Location:
    Kansas City USA
    Hey Nate. Tell me about the brakes, as to whether they should be changed for an upgrade. You have talked me out of the power steering unit--just buy the correct tires and that should work. Now about the brakes?
     
  6. vwnate1

    vwnate1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    11,643
    Location:
    AMERICA !
    Bendix Brakes

    They're very good on your '54 ~ they were used up to the late 1960's so parts are cheap and they're very reliable , have good stopping power with minimal foot effort .

    You can up grade the master cylinder to a dual system , this involves bending up and flaring some new tubing .

    Or , ad a vacuum power brake booster & master setup .

    One thing : resist the urge to turn the drums ~ even when you've run the old shoes to metal , it isn't necessary unless either :

    A. the brake pedal pulsates noticeably when you're stopping or

    B . the drums is severely bell mouthed , you'd know this as the shoes wear to one side thinner than the other .

    I have the benefit of Bendix Factory Training and they were insistent about NOT turning the drums because it causes heat fade .

    I hope this helps .

    (you didn't answer my question)
     
  7. ssexton1

    ssexton1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    82
    Location:
    Kansas City USA
    Oh yes, it is a factory installed Hydramatic original. 3100, 5-window cab with the bull-nose grill.

    Oh the other question is about the 6 volt to 12 volt conversion. Would you recommend it?
     
  8. ol' chebby

    ol' chebby Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,164
    Location:
    Charlotte,NC
    Definately. Replace all bulbs, Get an IC64 coil from NAPA, it has the internal resistor. Put a Runtz resistor on the fuel guage, leave the 6 v starter, just don't crank continuously.
     
  9. vwnate1

    vwnate1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    11,643
    Location:
    AMERICA !
    6 > 12 Volt Conversion

    Well ;

    I guess it depends .

    If you're going to want a fancy stereo , then _maybe_ .

    Keeping the truck in a good state of tune , it'll always be an easy starter cold or hot .

    Lights are marginally brighter on 12 volts , you can run electric windshield wipers too .

    My truck is 12 volts because the DPO did it , as it works , I don't fool with it much ,I had my fuel gauge re wound by my speedo repair guy and I still run the vacuum wipers , after sending the wiper motor out to Ficken Wiper Service in N.Y. , they work fine .

    I used to simply run a Voltage Inverter in my 6 volt trucks to get 12 volts for the radio , or I'd dig up an old 6 volt radio , they're not that difficult to find ,I have some old VW Beetle 6 volt radios I'm told are now worth over $100 ? . who knows , you're paying for it so follow your heart .

    I'm a geezer who likes things simple & reliable and stock always , ALWAYS beats Hot Rods in this respect , yes , I know the kiddies and lazy guys are going to all jump up and crucify me for saying this simple truth but it is so .
     
  10. ol' chebby

    ol' chebby Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,164
    Location:
    Charlotte,NC
    Only because you haven't been over to ride in MY hot rod........
     
  11. TonyinKC

    TonyinKC Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2010
    Messages:
    102
    Location:
    Parkville, Missouri
    Sandy. I wondered about switching to a better brake system but decided to stay with the original. These are trucks built to haul heavy loads with a brake system that can stop a heavy load. You'll never haul a heavy load. I'd go with the original system.

    jmho.
    Tony
     
  12. vwnate1

    vwnate1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    11,643
    Location:
    AMERICA !
    Stock Vs. Mods

    You know Russ ;

    You're one of the very few Hot Rodders I know who actually knows how to build things right but , I'm a geezer who's heard this claim over and over and .....

    Still , there's Nate wheezing & rattling through Death Valley , Mexico , Canada , Guatemala and beyond , always in some 95 % stock rig , I always get there in style and comfort , I've yet to meet any Hot Rod that can match me , speed isn't everything .

    As they say " your pays your monies and you makes your choices " ~ no one is wrong , just different .
     
  13. ssexton1

    ssexton1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    82
    Location:
    Kansas City USA
    As we are getting down to the connection for the 1954 Chevy Hydramatic Transmission we are missing some parts. This is from (1947-54) Factory Assembly Manual

    R--Control Shaft Lever
    S--Control Shaft
    U--Control Rod
    Q--Control Shaft Lower Support

    Any suggestions as to finding these parts?
     

Share This Page